x24,Top3,TopLeft,x25,x12
emeril with chefs
a discovery company

Bringing Back the Popularity of the Train

Eric Leech

By Eric Leech
Denver, CO, USA | Sat Aug 16, 2008 03:00 AM ET

TGV bullet train photo


Michael Dunning/Getty Images

With the price and inconvenience of air travel, people are undoubtedly taking a second look at the train as a method of transportation. While trains have traditionally been the airliners second ugly cousin named "Moley" over the past few decades, the introduction of the (TGV) Train A Grande Vitesse and Japanese Maglev has introduced quite the plastic surgery miracle to good old Moley.

The French Bullet train known as the TGV successfully achieved a world record run of 357 mph a few months back, proving to be one of the fastest trains in history. Japan has also been working on a new rail system called the Maglev that will be capable of transporting its travelers at speeds of up to 310 mph, although it has achieved a top speed record of 361 back in 2003.

With speeds like this, trains today are no longer all that much slower than taking a plane, especially if you consider the long security lines and delays associated with air travel. Brazil, Argentina, China, and the United States have all expressed interested in expanding on this technology, but with the initial price tag topping off at over $40 Billion, it is not exactly something that these nations can put on their Christmas list, unless taxpayers are feeling extra generous.

Such technology and speeds of these new trains are accomplished through the use of two 25,000 horsepower electric engines. Keep in mind, their diesel train forefathers are not only much heavier than electric, but also out-powered by these motors by as much as 20,000 horsepower in some cases.

Do these trains produce all that much less of a carbon footprint than a plane or road vehicle. Well, that all depends on several factors. It depends on where the train is sourcing is electricity. If it is getting it through a renewable power plant, we could be talking close to zero carbon. If it is through a coal-fire plant, we would be talking much higher.

It also depends on the number of passengers on each train. If a train was a little over half full, it might be comparable to the emissions of each passenger driving a small hybrid, and if the people were packed like sardines (as they have been known to do in Japan), you'd be looking at an extremely minimal carbon footprint per sardine.

The train is definitely making a comeback and some would say that a few of the other nations, including the US, should follow along in these low carbon footsteps. But with new technology surfacing in both the airliners and hybrids, it might be a flip of a coin as to where this money would be best spent.

This post was inspired by MEAN GREEN MACHINES.

 
  • email
  • digg
  • share
  • print
helpful article? vote for it
{ }
close window

CLOSE X

 

comments on this article

view all post a comment

 
 
 
 
 
facebook twitter rss
 
TV Module
 
 
Reel Impact
 
green diy projects
 
Take a Quiz. Enter Our Sweepstakes!
 

tv schedule

view all

On Now

On Tonight

 

today on planet green

view all

Votes

recent
discussed

Organic A-Z: Olives
POSTED  3 HOURS AGO.  COMMENTS

{ }

7 Weird Ways To Not Get Sick (...Including Kissing And Coffee)
POSTED  5 HOURS AGO.  COMMENTS

{ }

O is For Odd But Awesome Olive Oil Sundae
POSTED  5 HOURS AGO.  COMMENTS

{ }

O is For Olives: Pissaladiere with Caramelized Onions
POSTED  6 HOURS AGO.  COMMENTS

{ }

A Roadmap for Coast-to-Coast Activism: 50 States, 50 Eco-Groups
POSTED  6 HOURS AGO.  COMMENTS

{ }

Renovation Nation FAQ
POSTED  7 May 2009. 17 COMMENTS.

{166}

Ask Steve Thomas Anything (About Your Home)
POSTED  9 Feb 2009. 20 COMMENTS.

{386}

Emeril Green FAQ
POSTED  17 Dec 2008. 19 COMMENTS.

{307}

Ask Emeril Your Green Cooking Questions
POSTED  7 Apr 2009. 49 COMMENTS.

{499}

How to Go Green: Weddings
POSTED  9 May 2009. 9 COMMENTS.

{474}

 
 

Ads by Google